addLine (pt, pts )) 69 70 # rotate the profile 71 gmsh. addCircleArc (pts, c, pts )) 65 else : 66 pt = gmsh. addSpline (pts )) 60 61 if rounded : 62 # circle as trailing edge 63 c = gmsh. addPoint (naca, -naca, 0, lc1 )) 57 pts. 11 12 # create the boundary layer by extrusion, or as a mesh constraint? 13 by_extrusion = False 14 15 # rounded trailing edge? 16 rounded = True 17 18 # base mesh sizes 19 fact = 1 20 lc1 = 0.01 * fact 21 lc2 = 0.3 * fact 22 23 # generate curved mesh? 24 order2 = False 25 26 # xy coordinates of top part of NACA 0012 profile 27 naca = 49 50 # create profile from points 51 pts = 52 l = len (naca ) 53 for i in range ( 0, l // 2 ): 54 pts. add ( "NACA 0012" ) 8 9 # incidence angle 10 incidence = -math. See also the last Fossies "Diffs" side-by-side code changes report for "naca_boundary_layer_2d.py": 4.9.5_vs_4.10.0.ġ import gmsh 2 import sys 3 import math 4 import numpy as np 5 6 gmsh. The distance to the first grid point is calculated using the following equations.As a special service "Fossies" has tried to format the requested source page into HTML format using (guessed) Python source code syntax highlighting (style: standard) with prefixed line numbers.Īlternatively you can here view or download the uninterpreted source code file. Readers can refer the following equations to calculate the first cell height or simply use many online tools available to calculate it.The mesh can be generated using this first cell height and keeping about 4-8 (industry standard) of such layers of cells (prism layers) with a growth rate of 1.2 for smooth transition between fine mesh near the wall to coarse cell around.For internal flows, it is equal to the hydraulic diameter.) (The characteristic length in most simple terms is the approximate length traversed by the flow over the body, for external flows. This first cell height is practically the distance between the wall and the first grid point. Once we know the required y+, using the freestream flow velocity, the density of fluid, the characteristic length, and the viscosity, we can calculate the required first cell height.Here, we can also say that the v2f model is computationally more expensive than the realizable k-epsilon model as it requires more grid points closer to the wall. As an example, the v2f model requires y+ =1, while the realizable k-epsilon model required y+>=30. Check for the y+ requirements of that specific model.Decide a turbulence model based on the type of flow under consideration.Hence, the easiest approach for someone who is new to CFD, to correctly model the near wall mesh is by generating a mesh which satisfies the wall y+ requirements of a particular turbulence model. It defines a dimensionless height of the first grid point measured from the wall. However, each of the turbulence model presents a different kind of wall modelling approach which needs a different level of discretization close to the wall.Ī way to quantify this variation in near wall mesh requirement is by defining a quantity called as the wall y+. Fortunately, this need has been understood well by the developers of several turbulence models and they have incorporated wall modelling functions within the turbulence models. Hence, it is of prime interest to model these interactions around the wall with maximum accuracy and least computational effort. Also, it is very tough to maintain a low aspect ratio of cell close to the wall in such scenarios. However, as we know, the thickness of boundary layers can vary between an order of magnitude 10e12 to 10e3 m, it can be computationally very expensive to place sufficient grid points to capture the velocity profile. One intuitive way to achieve high accuracy would be to place as many grid points as possible close to the wall so as to capture the velocity profile accurately. In theory, the interaction of the flow with the object happens near the wall around the boundary layer and it is this region which governs a lot of key characteristics of the flow over a body, like skin friction drag, convective heat transfer, multi-phase film/particle deposition etc. Study of boundary layer effects has been a topic of interest for a long time for many aerodynamicists.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |